Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Missing Ingredient: Fluent Oral Reading

Authors: Anderson, Betty;

The Missing Ingredient: Fluent Oral Reading

Abstract

The rising popularity of reading-skill management systems and criterion-referenced testing seems to be leading to fragmentation of developmental reading instruction. The mastery of isolated reading skills, which such programs emphasize, may not lead to fluent reading ability with comprehension. Traditional remedial reading approaches (Monroe 1932; Gillingham and Stillman 1970) also stress mastery of specific skills; consequently, students who fail in classroom reading programs based on specific skills are not likely to respond favorably to similar remedial programs. There may be a need for such skill-oriented programs to include "reading practice" to build fluency. Oral reading techniques offer possibilities that could provide this missing ingredient. Four oral reading methods which have been used as developmental or remedial programs or supplements will be described below. All have reported successful applications or experimental research and offer promise for classroom and clinical use. The methods are neurological impress, echo reading, assisted reading, and repeated readings. The Neurological Impress Method (Nim) was developed by Heckelman (1966). It is a simultaneous oral reading method with the teacher and student sitting side by side sharing a book. The student is a little in front of the teacher so the teacher's voice is directed into the student's ear. At first the teacher, reading at a moderate pace, will lead. Sentences and paragraphs are reread as needed until fluency is achieved. When the student gains ability and confidence, he should lead, with the teacher reading softly

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

Education & Educational Research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!