
doi: 10.1086/448145
In "Duchamp's Mischief" (Critical Inquiry 7 [Summer 1981]: 747-60), Joel Rudinow tried to understand, if not exactly the achievement of Marcel Duchamp, then anyway his significance in modern art and philosophy. His remarks may cause us to reconsider our views about the artworld and Duchamp's role in it. Before looking at what Rudinow says about the artworld, it is worth looking at what some others have said about it. The term "artworld" owes its popularity to the fact that Arthur Danto used it as the title of a paper in 1964. Danto, however, has never been very clear-in that paper or anywhere else-about what exactly the term is supposed to stand for. Sometimes he wants to include works of art themselves in the
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
