
doi: 10.1086/375256
Private, not‐for‐profit, liberal arts colleges operate in a knotty market where consumers are both inputs and outputs and the total product is not directly observed. Our model explains interactions among price, quantity, reputation, and cost. The evidence suggests that these institutions alter tuition and financial aid to set price below the market‐clearing value; reputation is more a function of expenditure per student and student quality than tradition and endowment; costs depend more on student inputs and the price of faculty than that of capital; scale economies occur at less selective colleges with excess capacity; and a hierarchy exists among purveyors.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
