Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Statistics of Scientific Incunabula

Authors: C F, BUHLER;

The Statistics of Scientific Incunabula

Abstract

be shown that Jupiter was in the constellation Sagittarius at R.A. I8 hrs. 35 min., Dec. 23.05 on 6 August I664. With Schlesinger's "Catalogue of Bright Stars," it is found that the star HR 7128, magnitude 5.89, had the following coordinates: R.A. i8 hrs. 35.8 min., Dec. -23? 37'. In other words HR 7128 was not far from the plane of the genuine satellites and some I2 minutes of arc to the west of the planet. Satellite IV can appear over io' from its primary. The conclusion is inescapable. Star HR 7I28 was in the right place to be reasonably mistaken for a fifth moon. Therefore, the star best known nowadays as CPD -23?, I4844, appearing in Norton's and other atlases as Piazzi 225, is without doubt Winthrop's "satellite," actually a naked-eye star for all to see -and not to be confused with planetary attendants. The color is blue, spectral class B8; but, low down as it was, the pioneer scientists could hardly be expected to have been impressed with the difference between it and objects shining by reflected yellow sunlight as seen in a refracting instrument not corrected for chromatic aberration. Had Winthrop looked, even without his telescope, on the next few nights, he would have seen his would-be moon being left behind in the background of stars while the ranking planet of the solar family worked slowly east, while Barnard's atellite, snug in the inner circle, was still awaiting discovery.

Keywords

Incunabula as Topic, Science, Humans

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!