Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Carbon Abundances of M92 Red Giant Branch Stars

Authors: Susan Bellman; Michael M. Briley; Graeme H. Smith; C. F. Claver;

Carbon Abundances of M92 Red Giant Branch Stars

Abstract

Using CCD imaging, Fusi Pecci et al. have identified a local maximum at MV = -0.4 in the giant branch luminosity function of three co-added globular clusters having metallicities [Fe/H] ~ -2.2, including M92 (NGC 6341). Theories of deep mixing predict that surface carbon abundance depletions should be produced only within stars brighter than this luminosity function peak. Only in such red giants should the circulation-inhibiting molecular weight discontinuity between the base of the convective envelope and the hydrogen-burning shell be absent. However, spectroscopic analyses of M92 giants by Carbon et al. and Langer et al. indicate that surface carbon depletions may set in as faint as MV > 2.0. In order to further test this potential discord between theory and observations, KPNO 4 m telescope Hydra spectra were obtained of a sample of 50 red giants in M92 covering the absolute magnitude range -2.4 < MV < 1.4. Carbon abundances were determined by comparing a G-band index measured for the program stars to index values computed from synthetic stellar spectra. Analysis of these index values confirms a pattern of decreasing carbon abundance as a function of increasing evolutionary state among cluster members, in accord with the results of Carbon et al. and Langer et al. Our analysis indicates that carbon depletion sets in at absolute magnitudes at least as faint as MV =0.5–1.0, well below that of the luminosity function peak at MV = -0.4 for metal-poor clusters.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    49
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
49
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!