Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Fiber Digestion and Energy Utilization of Fat Sand Rats (Psammomys obesus) Consuming the ChenopodAnabasis articulata

Authors: A A, Degen; M, Kam; I S, Khokhlova; Y, Zeevi;

Fiber Digestion and Energy Utilization of Fat Sand Rats (Psammomys obesus) Consuming the ChenopodAnabasis articulata

Abstract

Most herbivorous rodents consume a variety of plants and, when available, select ones low in fiber content. In contrast, the fat sand rat (Psammomys obesus), a diurnal gerbillid rodent that is wholly herbivorous, is able to survive while consuming only the halophytic chenopod Anabasis articulata. We hypothesized that these gerbils are able to digest chenopods efficiently and that fiber digestion contributes substantially to their energy budget. Digestibility of total fibers (NDF), hemicellulose, and cellulose was 51.6%, 66.4%, and 44.0%, respectively. Energy derived from fiber digestion was 211.7 kJ kg(-0.75) d(-1) and resulted mostly from hemicellulose digestion. Average daily metabolic rate was 658.4 kJ kg(-0.75) d(-1), and basal metabolic rate (BMR) was determined to be close to 192.6 kJ kg(-0.75) d(-1). Therefore, fiber digestion provided 32% of maintenance requirements and 110% of BMR requirements, one of the highest values reported thus far for placental mammals. The efficiency of utilization of the chenopod was 0.29, a low value compared to other dietary items. We concluded that A. articulata fulfills all the energy and nutrient requirements of fat sand rats, even though energy yields and efficiency of utilization of its energy is low.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Dietary Fiber, Male, Animals, Chenopodiaceae, Plants, Edible, Energy Metabolism, Gerbillinae, Adaptation, Physiological

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!