The study of interspecific competition has long been one of ecology's most fashionable pursuits. Stimulated in part by a simple theory (Lotka 1932; Volterra 1926; Gause 1934; Hutchinson 1959; MacArthur and Levins 1967), ecologists gathered numerous data on the apparent ways species competitively coexist or exclude one another (reviews in Schoener 1974b, 1983). As is typical in science, most of the early data were observational, and the few experimental studies were mostly performed in the laboratory rather than in the field. Though never lacking its doubters, the belief in the natural importance of interspecific competition is now being severely questioned (review in Schoener 1982). Many of the putatively supportive observations have been challenged as being statistically indistinguishable from random contrivance. Most such attacks have been rebutted, but not without some modification of original conclusions (e.g., papers in Strong et al. 1983). New observations have been gathered for certain systems, suggesting a lack of competitively caused patterns and catalyzing the variable environment view of Wiens (1977) in which competition is seen as a temporally sporadic, often impotent, interaction. Other critics have charged that the lack of experimental field evidence for competition would preclude its acceptance regardless of the quality of observational data. Indeed, results of some of the earlier field experiments are in part responsible for competition's presently beleaguered state. Connell (1975), after reviewing the field experiments known to him through 1973, concluded that predation, rather than competition, appears to be the predominant ecological interaction and should be given "conceptual priority." Shortly afterward, Schroder and Rosenzweig (1975) showed experimentally that two species of desert rodents overlapping substantially in habitat did not appear to affect one another's abundances. This result was interpreted as contradicting a crucial assumption of competition theory, almost its linchpin: the greater the resource overlap between species, the greater the competition coefficient, a measure of the intensity of interspecific competition (relative to intraspecific competition; MacArthur and Levins 1967; review in Roughgarden 1979).