
doi: 10.1086/222219
The proposed model operationally defines "counteractance" in three tenses by formulas specifying: how to identify it in fitting harmonic curves (i.e.,=k/x); how to produce it from preconditions of two measurable and opposed interactions where everyone has equal opportunity to interact; and how to predict in such situations. In four controlled experiments in series of towns an interaction in the form of the diffusion of a message was found with excellent fits to vary inversely with powers of four counteracting factors when isolated in turn, namely: the distance between interactors; the time sequence of interacting; the population size of interactors; and increments in stimulation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
