Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Astrophysical Jo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Astrophysical Journal
Article . 1987 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

A comparison between mass-losing and standard solar models

Authors: Joyce A. Guzik; L. A. Willson; Wendee M. Brunish;

A comparison between mass-losing and standard solar models

Abstract

The effects of main-sequence mass loss on the evolution, interior structure, and surface composition of the sun are studied. Modeling results are presented for three mass-losing solar models of initial mass two solar, plus a standard one solar mass comparison model. It is shown that the solar models can be evolved to produce present-day solar models that do not differ radically in structure and composition from standard solar models. The mass-losing models require low initial He-4 abundances and predict high surface He-3 abundances that are near the limits, yet still within the bounds, of observational estimates. The mass-losing models have somewhat higher B-8 neutrino fluxes, but standard solar models also fail to reproduce observations by a wide margin. For mass-losing models, protosolar Li and Be are completely destroyed, requiring a mechanism for partial replenishment to observed surface abundances. 34 references.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    38
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
38
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
gold