
Increasing number of soil testing laboratories in the mid-Atlantic and southeastern states of the United States are adopting Mehlich-3 (M-3) as the official extraction procedure in place of Mehlich-1 (M-1) or the dilute double acid method. Several studies have indicated that the M-3 has at least equivalent if not better extractability, particularly of micronutrients in the acidic and mineral soils in these regions. The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between the two Mehlich procedures and to provide conversion equations from M-1 to M-3 procedure. This is expected to serve as an estimate of nutrient availabilities particularly by the extension personnel and crop professionals evaluating different test procedures. A set of 519 mineral soil samples received at the UF/IFAS Extension Soil Testing Laboratory were selected and assayed with both M-1 and M-3 extracting solutions. The concentrations of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), mang...
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
