
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Urea fertilizers may lose N by ammonia volatilization when applied in the field. In order to reduce this loss, modified urea compounds are being used. Not all of them reduce ammonia loss and improve crop yields. A field study was conducted to evaluate the comparative advantage of cogranulated urea-urea phosphate (340 g N kg−1, 73 g P kg−1) over urea (460 g N kg−1) and ammonium nitrate (350 g N kg−1) when supplied as nitrogen fertilizers to maize. The fertilizer granules were applied at rates of 67, 134 and 202 kg N ha−1, as surface-broadcast or soil-incorporated treatments. Fertilizer application increased crop yields and nitrogen uptake, but the sources were not significantly different from each other. Increasing nitrogen supply up to 134 kg N ha−1 improved maize yield and nitrogen uptake. Incorporating the fertilizer with the soil was not better than surface application. The data available suggest that maize responded to cogranulated urea-urea phosphate, urea and ammonium nitrate similarly.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
