<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 10419/202253 , 10419/228381
ABSTRACTThe adoption of flat tax systems in Central and Eastern European countries have often been supported by arguments of simplicity, higher compliance and lower distortionary effects. However, ...
DSGE model, inequality, Steuerpolitik, H23, Economics, H24, growth, Ungleichheit, Steuersystem, Lietuva (Lithuania), Einkommensteuer, H31, difference in income, I32, D31, Mokesčiai / Taxation, tax policy, ddc:330, assessment basis, Wirtschaft, tax progression, tax system, simulation, Flat tax, Europe, Öffentliche Finanzen und Finanzwissenschaft, Public Finance, employment, income tax, D04, microsimulation model, E62, D63, inequality progressivity, Steuerprogression, Bemessungsgrundlage, Einkommensunterschied, Europa, Simulation, Flat tax; microsimulation model; DSGE model; growth; European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) 2015, ddc: ddc:330
DSGE model, inequality, Steuerpolitik, H23, Economics, H24, growth, Ungleichheit, Steuersystem, Lietuva (Lithuania), Einkommensteuer, H31, difference in income, I32, D31, Mokesčiai / Taxation, tax policy, ddc:330, assessment basis, Wirtschaft, tax progression, tax system, simulation, Flat tax, Europe, Öffentliche Finanzen und Finanzwissenschaft, Public Finance, employment, income tax, D04, microsimulation model, E62, D63, inequality progressivity, Steuerprogression, Bemessungsgrundlage, Einkommensunterschied, Europa, Simulation, Flat tax; microsimulation model; DSGE model; growth; European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) 2015, ddc: ddc:330
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |