<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 6507334
Abstract A question often neglected in the literature on forensic hypnosis is: Are there circumstances that ought to influence the decision to use hypnosis in the first place? To ensure that forensic hypnosis is used appropriately, federal investigative agencies have developed guidelines that require careful review of investigative, forensic, and potential hypnotic considerations. Such considerations include the merit and priority of the case, prior progress, existing forensic difficulties, the role of the interviewee in the investigation, other testimony, physical evidence, and the likelihood that information derived from hypnosis could be independently corroborated. These guidelines are explained as precautions against using hypnosis as a substitute for traditional techniques and to assure the potential of hypnosis when it is employed.
Criminal Law, Mental Recall, Humans, Forensic Psychiatry, Hypnosis
Criminal Law, Mental Recall, Humans, Forensic Psychiatry, Hypnosis
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |