
doi: 10.1075/tsl.65.09lap
Based on a Relevance Theory-informed view of language development, this paper argues that grammatical relations are construction-specific conventionalizations (grammaticalizations) of implicatures which arise out of repeated patterns of reference to particular types of referents. Once conventionalized, these structures function to constrain the hearer's identification of referents in discourse. As they are construction-specific, and hence language-specific, there is no category "subject" across languages; different languages will either show this type of grammaticalization or not, and if they do, may show it or not in different constructions. Any cross-linguistic use of terms such as "subject" (and "S", as in "SOV") should then be avoided.
ddc:400, 2004 (four-digit-FOR), 380207 Linguistic Structures (incl. Grammar, Semantics), Phonology, 200408 Linguistic Structures (incl. Grammar, Grammatiktheorie, Lexicon, 400
ddc:400, 2004 (four-digit-FOR), 380207 Linguistic Structures (incl. Grammar, Semantics), Phonology, 200408 Linguistic Structures (incl. Grammar, Grammatiktheorie, Lexicon, 400
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
