
handle: 10550/94463
Epistemic modality and evidentiality are two categories that have not been clearly defined in the literature. In order to clarify the boundaries between them, I draw a detailed semantic map for Catalan modal verbs deure (‘must’), haver de (‘have to’) and poder (‘can/may’) in the Old period (11th–16th centuries). On the one hand, the modals deure and haver de develop an evidential reading (inferential process). On the other hand, an epistemic possibility value arises in the case of poder, which is not based on any explicit premise. I show that all these verbs are subjectively construed in different degrees and argue that a clear distinction between the subjective values and an evidential or epistemic interpretation is paramount.
UNESCO::LINGÜÍSTICA::Lingüística diacrónica, inference, dynamic modality, subjectification, deontic modality, evidentiality, epistemic modality, possibility, UNESCO::LINGÜÍSTICA::Teoría lingüística
UNESCO::LINGÜÍSTICA::Lingüística diacrónica, inference, dynamic modality, subjectification, deontic modality, evidentiality, epistemic modality, possibility, UNESCO::LINGÜÍSTICA::Teoría lingüística
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
