Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Chinesische Sprachreform

Provokation und Initiation Die Kernpunkte der Esperanto-Debatte von 1916-1919
Authors: Boris P. Morosoli;

Chinesische Sprachreform

Abstract

SUMMARY Chinese Language Reform: Esperanto as Provocation and Inspiration Between 1916 and 1919, Esperanto's claim to the position of a common international language was hotly debated in the avant-garde Chinese journal Xin Qingnian. Closer analysis reveals a number of complex subtexts underlying the Utopian visions put forward by Chinese linguists and language planners like Qian Xuantong. As a linguistic model, Esperanto helped to catalyze new approaches to Chinese phonetical transciption and writing reform, and to the shaping of a common Chinese language. The Esperanto debate was also part of the wider battle over the Chinese classical tradition: Qian's provocative call for the abolition of the Chinese language must be regarded as a direct attack on the conservative Chinese literati. RESUMO Reformo de la ĉina lingo: Esperanto kiel provokilo kaj stimulilo Inter 1916 kaj 1919 ardis debato en la avangarda cina revuo Xin Qingnian pri la pretendoj de Esperanto kiel internacia lingvo. Pli detala analizo montras, al kiaj komplikaj motivoj kaj ideoj respondis la ŝajne utopiaj proponoj de ĉinaj lingvoreformistoj kiel Qian Xuantong. Interalie, Esperanto kiel lingva modelo helpis katalizi novajn alirojn al la fonetika transskribo kaj skribsistema reformo de la ĉina lingvo, same kiel al ĝia socia funkciado. Aliflanke, la tuta Esperanto-debato nur eris en pli vasta batalo pri la klasika literatura tradicio: tiukadre necesas konsideri la provokan alvokon de Qian por abolo de la ĉina lingvo kiel rektan atakon al la konservativuloj.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!