
doi: 10.1075/ftl.5.06fer
Abstract This paper analyses deliberate metaphor use in three Hippocratic treatises and in Empedocles’ two famous similes. By exclusively examining direct metaphors and their textual markers, I first investigate the communicative function metaphors have in ancient Greek anatomical and physiological argumentation. These are illustrative tools, items of evidence and/or elements that demonstrate a given hypothesis, as well as instruments of a heuristic method of enquiry. Second, I show that there are explicit claims by both authors to deliberate metaphor use: they claim to use metaphors as metaphors and leave their addressees no option but to recognise the source domain as such, as this represents the field in which both theoretical construction and the demonstration of a given hypothesis take place.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 55 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
