Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Functional Plant Bio...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Functional Plant Biology
Article . 2002 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Plant growth regulators and phloem exudates modulate root nodulation of soybean

Authors: Asghari, Bano; James E, Harper;

Plant growth regulators and phloem exudates modulate root nodulation of soybean

Abstract

A time-course study was conducted on the effect of synthetic ABA and phloem exudate on root nodulation, nitrogenase activity, and dry matter content of pouch-grown soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. A hypernodulating mutant (NOD1-3) derived from the cultivar Williams was evaluated. The normally-nodulating cultivar Williams 82 served as the control. All phases of nodulation (nodule initiation, development and function) were inhibited by 1–50 µM synthetic ABA treatment of roots of pouch-grown soybean. The ABA effect was more pronounced for the treatment made 24 h prior to inoculation. The magnitude of inhibition of nodulation by ABA and by phloem exudate from inoculated Williams 82 was decreased when application was delayed to 48 h post-inoculation. Synthetic indoleacetic acid and benzyladenine (1 and 5 µM) also inhibited the number of nodules per plant, and the magnitude of inhibition was greater in the normally-nodulating Williams 82 cultivar than in the NOD1-3 hypernodulating mutant. Changes in endogenous free ABA in cotyledons, leaves, and xylem sap of seedlings were monitored at 24-h intervals after inoculation in both lines, and appeared to respond to inoculation. Addition of crude phloem exudate from Williams 82 or hypernodulating NOD1-3 was inhibitory to root nodulation of NOD1-3 — this effect was concentration dependent. Partially-purified (acidic aqueous fraction) phloem exudate from Williams 82 suppressed nodulation in NOD1-3 by 54% (averaged over a 7-d time-course), while partially-purified phloem exudate (acidic aqueous fraction) from NOD1-3 was much less inhibitory (23%). ABA levels in the phloem fractions applied were nearly identical (15.6 vs 16.0 ng mL–1), which indicates that ABA was not directly affecting nodulation control. Partially-purified extract (acidic aqueous fraction) from leaves of nodulated NOD1-3 was much less inhibitory to nodulation of NOD1-3 seedlings than was the comparable fraction from Williams 82. Although free ABA applied exogenously was capable of altering nodulation, it does not appear that endogenous ABA levels directly account for the autoregulatory control of nodulation in soybean. This implies that there may be factor(s) moving in the phloem other than ABA that possibly impact expression of root nodulation. Alternatively, it may be that plant development is responsive to interactions among plant growth regulators mediated by subtle changes in individual hormone concentrations. The possibility remains that normally-nodulating and hypernodulating lines have differential sensitivity to ABA, and that this explains altered nodulation control at similar levels of endogenous ABA.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!