Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Assessing Wiltshire Horn-Merino crosses. 3. The 50% Wiltshire Horn as a prime lamb producer

Authors: KA Rathie; CK Teasdale;

Assessing Wiltshire Horn-Merino crosses. 3. The 50% Wiltshire Horn as a prime lamb producer

Abstract

Wiltshire Horn-Merino (WH-M) and Border Leicester-Merino (BL-M) ewes, both with 50% Merino ancestry, were mated in late spring to lamb in 1985 and 1986 to either Dorset Horn (DH) or WH-M rams. Lambs from WH-M sires grew more slowly than lambs from DH sires, by 2 to 13% depending on dam breed and age of lamb. Lambs from WH-M dams grew 3 4 % slower than lambs from BL-M dams in 1985, a year of good pasture and with only DH rams used. In the following year, they grew at a similar rate from birth to weaning if from DH sires, but 11% more slowly if by WH-M sires. From weaning to turnoff, the ranking was reversed, with lambs from WH-M dams growing 11% faster, and sire breed not significant. When mated to DH rams, both the WH-M and BL-M ewes produced lambs with similar dressing percentages and fat depths over the 12th rib. Lambs sired by WH-M rams were leaner than those sired by DH rams, particularly for single-born lambs. The WH-M ewes tended to have a higher percentage of lambs marked per ewe joined than the BL-M ewes, but the advantage was not statistically significant. The difference was mainly due to fewer barren ewes, but the WH-M ewes also showed slightly higher prolificacy. The WH-M ewe shows good fertility and prolificacy, and when mated to a DH ram gives lambs with growth and carcase characteristics very similar to a BL-M identically mated. Mated to a WH-M ram, it gives slower growth but leaner carcases capable of being efficiently grown to heavier liveweights than conventional Australian 3-breed crosses.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!