Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Early detection of dwarf off-types from micropropagated Cavendish bananas

Authors: MK Smith; SD Hamill;

Early detection of dwarf off-types from micropropagated Cavendish bananas

Abstract

A method was developed for early detection of dwarf off-types from micropropagated bananas (Musa sp., AAA Group, Cavendish subgroup). Selection of dwarfs was from glasshouse-grown plants, and although differences between dwarf and normal plants could be detected as early as 3 weeks from deflasking, discrimination was most effective at week 7, when the normal plants had reached a height of 18-20 cm. In order to develop selection criteria, known dwarf off-types and normal plants were micropropagated and established in a glasshouse. Measurements included plant height, petiole - - length, lamina length and width, and distance between leaves. Petiole length, lamina length, and the petiole to lamina length ratio provided the most promising selection criteria, with the dwarfs having significantly (P<0.01) smaller petioles and leaves than the normal plants. Selection was most effective when the plants were growing vigorously and uniformly. When growth became limiting, selection was more difficult. This was particularly apparent in plants that required repotting into larger containers and in micropropagated bananas grown in nurseries under suboptimal conditions. Plants were grown in the field and observed at bunch emergence, to verify trueness to type and to eliminate the possibility that off-types may have arisen in the normal and dwarf populations. A survey of these selection criteria with other Cavendish cultivars of various statures was also completed and the results suggest that dwarf and extra-dwarf off-types could be readily separated from the taller Cavendish cultivars Williams, New Guinea Cavendish, and Grande Naine.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!