
doi: 10.1071/ea99128
The water potentials of canola branches and leaves were compared using a pressure chamber to determine whether they produced similar results. This study also investigated the magnitude of errors in the water status of canola resulting from re-cutting the branches, and the effects of delaying readings. The use of branches containing pods or pods and flowers/buds gave very good correlation with leaves. As this is the area of greatest photosynthesis and transpiration from mid-flowering, it provides an easily obtainable source material close to the main growth areas to measure plant water potential. Storage of both leaves and stems before measurement is an acceptable procedure if a large number of samples are required to be completed or portable equipment is not available provided precautions are taken to prevent moisture loss. Re-cutting the branch leads to lower water potential and should be avoided.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
