Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Australian Journal o...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Carcass and meat quality of Bos indicus x Bos taurus and Bos taurus cattle in northern Australia

Authors: JR Wythes; WR Shorthose; RM Dodt; RF Dickinson;

Carcass and meat quality of Bos indicus x Bos taurus and Bos taurus cattle in northern Australia

Abstract

Liveweights, carcass characteristics, bruising and muscle properties of Bos indicus x Bos taurus (BiX) and Bos taurus (Bt) cattle (1070 steers and 394 cows) were compared from 7 experiments throughout Queensland. In general, the cattle were weighed (unfasted), transported as mixed genotype groups to an abattoir and given access to water from arrival until slaughter. Access to feed varied between experiments. Mustering to slaughter periods varied from 4 to 9 days. For steers, mean liveweight at slaughter and carcass characteristics (weight, dressing percentage, liver weight and rib fat depth) were generally similar for BiX and Bt. In 1 of the 5 experiments with steers, BiX had a greater (P<0.05) mean liveweight, carcass weight, dressing percentage and liver weight. In both of the experiments with cows, BiX had greater (P<0.05) mean carcass weight but in only 1 experiment greater (P<0.05) mean liveweight and dressing percentage. There were no consistent differences between BiX and Bt in bruise score. Meat properties were compared in 1 experiment each for steers and for cows. BiX cows had a greater (P<0.05) mean initial yield(YI) shear value and tended to have a greater peak force (PF) for M. longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle than Bt cows. BiX had a lower (P<0.05) PF - IY value. Genotype had no significant effect on shear values and sarcomere length in steers or on cooking loss in steers and cows. Over all experiments, there was a higher (P<0.05) percentage of Bt than BiX carcasses ( 8.5 v. 3.7%) with high pH (> 6.0) values 24 h post mortem (pH24) for LD muscle. Genotype had no significant effect on mean pH24 and ultimate pH in cows or steers. Significantly more (P<0.05) cow than steer carcasses had high pHz4 values (10.9 v. 5.0%). In 2 experiments, more (P<0.05) heads and tongues were condemned for BiX than Bt steers, but there was no significant difference for the percentage of burst rumens. We conclude that the belief held by producers, butchers and others that BiX cattle have more bruising and produce darker meat than Bt cattle is unfounded. The overall toughness of meat from cattle slaughtered in northern Australia is of much greater concern than minor differences between genotypes.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!