Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Reliability of extrusa samples collected from steers fistulated at the oesophagus to estimate the diet of resident animals in grazing experiments

Authors: DB Coates; P Schachenmann; RJ Jones;

Reliability of extrusa samples collected from steers fistulated at the oesophagus to estimate the diet of resident animals in grazing experiments

Abstract

The legume content of the diet of groups of resident cattle (LDR) continuously grazing a number of grass-stylo pastures was determined by the faecal carbon isotope ratio (�13C) technique on various occasions. At the same time the pastures were sampled by non-resident steers fistulated at the oesophagus (OF steers) and the legume content of their extrusa (LEO) was determined. Overall, the linear relationship between LEO and LDR had a coefficient of determination (r2) of only 0.127, indicating that LDR could not be reliably predicted from LEO. The LEO of morning samples was often markedly different from LEO of afternoon samples. The implications of the results for diet selection work on grass-legume pastures using OF animals are discussed. Researchers need to recognise that quality attributes of extrusa collected from OF animals do not necessarily reflect those of the diet of resident test animals.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    27
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
27
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!