Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Potassium nutrition of irrigated potatoes in South Australia. I. Effect on tuber yield and the prediction of tuber yield response by soil analysis

Authors: NA Maier;

Potassium nutrition of irrigated potatoes in South Australia. I. Effect on tuber yield and the prediction of tuber yield response by soil analysis

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted over 4 years at 25 sites throughout the main potato-growing areas of South Australia to calibrate the 0.5M sodium bicarbonate extraction procedure as a soil test for potassium and to examine the responses of irrigated potatoes to rates up to 1280 kg/ha K applied as potassium sulfate or potassium chloride either banded at planting or side-dressed after emergence. Potassium application at planting increased yield (P < 0.05) at 10 sites. The mean percentage yield deficit was 21%. There were significant correlations between relative yield and clay and sand contents, cation exchange capacity and bicarbonate-extractable potassium concentration in 0-15-cm surface soil samples collected before potassium fertiliser was applied. Percentage silt and pH were not correlated with relative yield. The bicarbonate-extractable potassium soil test accounted for 70% of the variance in relative yield compared with only 27% for percentage clay and 22% for cation exchange capacity. The prognostic critical bicarbonate-extractable potassium concentrations were: 153 -t 12 mg/kg for the Smith-Dolby bent hyperbola model, 143 mg/kg for the Cate-Nelson separation, and 133 or 176 mg/kg for the Mitscherlich model (concentrations at relative yields of 90 and 95% respectively). Yield responses are likely when soil bicarbonate- extractable potassium concentrations are below 120 mg/kg (deficient range), uncertain between 12 1 and 200 mg/kg (marginal range) and unlikely above 200 mg/kg (non-responsive range). Banding potassium chloride at planting significantly reduced yield compared with potassium sulfate at 2 out of the 14 sites used. The yield reductions occurred with potassium rates of 160 kg/ha or higher. There were significant increases in yield with side-dressing compared with basal application, at 2 of 5 responsive sites using rates of 320 kg/ha K or higher. None of the side-dressing treatments reduced tuber yields below control yields.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!