Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Resistance to grain protectants in field populations of the sawtoothed grain beetle in southern Queensland

Authors: PJ Collins;

Resistance to grain protectants in field populations of the sawtoothed grain beetle in southern Queensland

Abstract

Resistance of field strains of Oryzaephilus surinamensis L. (sawtoothed grain beetle) to grain protectants was assessed using commercial dose rates of protectant in treated grain bioassays. Grain protectants tested were: chlorpyrifos- methyl, 5 and 10 mg/kg grain; methacriphos, 10 and 18 mg/kg; pirimiphos-methyl 4 mg/kg; fenitrothion, 12 mg/kg, plus carbaryl, 8 mg/kg; fenitrothion, 12 mg/kg, plus bioresmethrin, 1 mg/kg, plus piperonyl butoxide, 8 mg/ kg; pyrethrins, 3 mg/kg, plus piperonyl butoxide, 24 mg/kg. About 10% of farms surveyed and about 42% of merchant premises were infested. Most of the insects originating from farms were effectively controlled by all grain protectants. However, some strains showed less than 100% adult mortality and some progeny production when treated with: chloropyrifos-methyl at 5 mg/kg; pirimiphos-methyl; and pyrethrins plus piperonyl butoxide. In contrast, for all strains obtained from the premises of grain merchants, none of the grain protectants, except methacrifos at 18 mg/kg, caused complete adult mortality whilst fenitrothion, chlorpyrifos-methyl at 5 mg/kg and pyrethrins plus piperonyl butoxide failed to completely suppress progeny production in some strains. A composite strain showed no mortality with fenitrothion at 12 mg/kg after five generations of laboratory selection.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!