Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Australian Journal o...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Performance of Hereford and Friesian × Hereford dams and their Hereford- and Friesian-sired progeny in a Mediterranean environment

Authors: DR Gifford; PC Stephens; RJ Lampe; RW Ponzoni; HR Day;

Performance of Hereford and Friesian × Hereford dams and their Hereford- and Friesian-sired progeny in a Mediterranean environment

Abstract

The reproductive and maternal performance of Hereford and Friesian x Hereford dams and the growth and carcase characteristics of their Hereford- and Friesian-sired calves in the Mediterranean environment of South Australia are reported. The two dam breeds did not differ in fertility and their calves had similar mortality rates. Even though calves from Hereford dams were lighter at birth than those from crossbred dams (30.8 vs 33.0 kg), Hereford dams required more assistance at calving (16% vs 8%). There were no differences in birth weight and incidence of calving difficulty of Hereford- and Friesian-sired progeny, but Friesian-sired progeny had a higher mortality rate (11% vs 5%). Calves from crossbred dams were heavier at weaning than those from Hereford dams (274 vs 235 kg) but Hereford- and Friesian-sired progeny were the same weight at weaning. Friesian-sired steers were heavier than Hereford-sired steers at 19- 21 months of age (478 vs 448 kg). The carcase characteristics of progeny of the two dam breeds did not differ significantly at either slaughter age. There were no significant differences in carcase characteristics of Hereford- and Friesian sired progeny slaughtered at 8- 10 months of age. When progeny were slaughtered at 19- 21 months of age, carcases of Friesian-sired steers were heavier (238 vs 222 kg) and leaner (0.49 vs 0.86 mm) than those of Hereford-sired steers. The practical implications of the use of Hereford and Friesian breeds in the southern Australian beef industry are discussed.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!