Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Australian Journal o...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Non-volatile nematicides for control of burrowing nematode in banana plantations in north Queensland

Authors: RA Broadley;

Non-volatile nematicides for control of burrowing nematode in banana plantations in north Queensland

Abstract

In a field trial which started at planting, Radopholus similis was controlled by fensulfothion applied at 2.0 g a.i. stool-1 in June and December each year for 4 years. Ethoprophos, fenamiphos and oxamyl applied at the same rate and times were less effective but they did reduce the rate of increase in numbers of nematodes. All treatments increased yields, especially in the third and fourth bunch cycles. The increase was due to larger bunches and to fewer plants falling over. Yields over the entire period were increased by 44% with fensulfothion, 29% with fenamiphos and ethoprophos, and by 21% with oxamyl. In three further trials which were started in the second or third bunch cycles, fenamiphos applied at 2.0 g a.i. stool-1 six times a year gave better nematode control than when it was applied three times a year, or than ethoprophos applied at 6.0 g a.i. stool-1 twice a year. Yields were increased by up to 60%.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!