Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Australian Journal o...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Rooting of peach hardwood and semi-hardwood cuttings

Authors: C. Tsipouridis; T. Thomidis; A. Isaakidis;

Rooting of peach hardwood and semi-hardwood cuttings

Abstract

The influence of some external factors important for the rooting of semi-hardwood and hardwood peach cuttings planted in a mist propagation unit with a bottom heat bench were investigated. Cuttings from 1-year-old trees had relatively higher rooting percentages after storage at 2–4ºC for 2 and 3 months, while cuttings from 11-year-old trees had the highest rooting percentage at the first planting. Cold storage appeared to decrease rooting of the cuttings from 11-year-old trees significantly. The greatest length of semi-hardwood cuttings was 15–20 cm long. Hardwood cuttings collected from the middle of the shoot on 4 November gave the best results. Spring Crest, Arm King and GF677 had the highest rooting percentages (averaged across all levels), while the cultivars Andross, Flavour Crest and Katerina rooted poorly. The effect of 5 indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) concentrations on the rooting of peach hardwood cuttings were also tested. Generally, IBA concentration at rates of 2000 mg/L gave very good rooting.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!