Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Australian Journal o...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Cytogenetics and reproductive biology of mangroves in Rhizophoraceae

Authors: Anand Prakash Tyagi;

Cytogenetics and reproductive biology of mangroves in Rhizophoraceae

Abstract

Three mangrove species, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza (L.) Lam., Rhizophora samoensis (Hochr.) Salvoza, Rhizophora stylosa Griff. and a putative hybrid Rhizophora × selala (Salvoza) between the latter two species were studied for their cytogenetics and reproductive biology. Although chromosome numbers in all four taxa were confirmed as 2 n = 36, the size of the chromosomes was slightly larger in genus Bruguiera . Regular chromosome pairing was observed in the three species; however, in the hybrid meiosis was very irregular. Pollen viability in all three species was very high (>80%); however, in the hybrid pollen viability was <10%. This could be due to non-homology in the chromosomes of the two parental species and irregular meiosis in the hybrid. Due to highly irregular meiosis in the hybrid and uneven distribution of chromosomes to the two poles, most of the pollen was non-viable. All three species were fully self-compatible. Between B. gymnorrhiza and the two Rhizophora species, pollen in crosses and reciprocal crosses failed to germinate, indicating cross-incompatibility between these two genera. Partial cross-compatibility was recorded between R. samoensis and R. stylosa . In many crosses, pollen tubes were observed growing freely up to the base of the style. This also accords with occasional crossing of these species in nature. However, due to only partial homology in the chromosomes of these two species, the hybrids produced are always sterile. Similarly, cross-compatibility between the hybrid and its two parental species was also partial. This could be attributed to allelic differences between the two species and their hybrid and also to physiological and/or chemical hindrance of the pollen-tube growth through the stylar tissue.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!