Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Animal Production Sc...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Animal Production Science
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Piglet performance and immunity is determined by the parity of both the birth dam and the rearing dam

Authors: Y. J. Miller; A. M. Collins; D. Emery; D. J. Begg; R. J. Smits; P. K. Holyoake;

Piglet performance and immunity is determined by the parity of both the birth dam and the rearing dam

Abstract

Gilt progeny have lower weaning weights and higher post-weaning medication and mortality rates, indicating greater disease susceptibility, than do sow progeny. The present study aimed to identify explanatory innate or adaptive immunity differences between gilt and sow progeny and potential pre- or post-natal influences. Sixty-four dams were vaccinated twice pre-farrowing with tetanus toxoid (TT). Serum (pre-vaccination) and colostrum and/or milk samples were collected to determine concentrations of TT-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG), by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Piglets were removed from their birth dam before suckling and fostered (not to their birth dam) to form 16 gilt and 16 sow litters, with five gilt-born and five sow-born piglets per litter. Piglets were vaccinated at weaning (4 weeks old) with either TT or saline (control). Sera and whole blood were collected from three gilt-born and three sow-born piglets per litter at 2, 4 and 7 weeks of age. Innate immunity was assessed indirectly on whole blood using an interferon gamma (IFN-?) immune cell stimulation assay and a phagocytic assay. Piglets were weighed at birth, 4, 10, 17 and 22 weeks of age. There was no difference (P > 0.05) in the concentration of TT-specific IgG in colostrum and milk from gilts and older-parity sows, suggesting a similar ability to transfer IgG antibodies to a novel antigen. Birth dam parity did not affect piglets’ TT-specific IgG concentrations pre-weaning (P > 0.05) suggesting similar ability to absorb passively acquired IgG. Sow-reared piglets, however, had lower (P < 0.05) concentrations of TT-specific IgG than did gilt-reared piglets, possibly due to haemodilution in the faster-growing sow progeny. Gilt-born progeny had a reduced IgG response post-weaning to TT vaccination relative to sow-born progeny (P < 0.05), indicating adaptive immunity differences. Birth dam parity did not affect (P > 0.05) innate immunity (number/responsiveness of cells). Rearing dam parity influenced phagocytic activity pre- and post-weaning (gilt-reared > sow-reared; P < 0.05), possibly due to increased pathogen challenge. Birthweight was affected by birth dam parity (sow-born > gilt-born; P < 0.05) while rearing dam parity determined weaning weight (sow-reared > gilt-reared; P < 0.05), with no difference evident at 22 weeks. The results of the present study suggest that gilt-born progeny may be more susceptible to disease post-weaning than sow-born progeny due to their lower birthweight and reduced humoral immune responsiveness. The rearing dam may also affect disease susceptibility in progeny due to slower pre-weaning growth, lower weaning weights and increased pathogen challenge, both pre- and post-weaning.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!