
doi: 10.1068/p6731
pmid: 22208126
2-D cues to perceived depth organization have been used to segregate test and mask stimulus components in a discrimination task. Observers made either spatial-frequency or orientation judgments on a rectangular test component by itself or in the presence of constant rectangular masks. There were two basic masking conditions: same-plane or different-plane. In the same-plane conditions, the test components and masks are perceived as existing in the same depth plane. In the different-plane conditions, the test and mask components are perceived to exist in different depth planes. The perception of different depth planes was achieved by using perceived occlusion, which could place either component closer or further from the observer. The results suggest that when test and mask components are separated into different depth planes they no longer influence one another. This effect could be observed in either depth organization, test components in front of the masks or mask components in front of the test. These results indicate that the figure – ground organization of components is not important. Only the designation as existing in the same or different depth planes affects whether or not a mask is effective.
Male, Depth Perception, Optical Illusions, Field Dependence-Independence, Contrast Sensitivity, Young Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Orientation, Space Perception, Humans, Attention, Female, Cues, Perceptual Masking
Male, Depth Perception, Optical Illusions, Field Dependence-Independence, Contrast Sensitivity, Young Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Orientation, Space Perception, Humans, Attention, Female, Cues, Perceptual Masking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
