
doi: 10.1068/p5916
pmid: 19662942
In this series of studies we examine the importance of component features (line segments and corners) of a distractor in producing distractor interference. We postulated that corners are non-accidental features and therefore crucial components in the processing of distractors (Kritikos and Pavlis 2007, Experimental Brain Research183 159–170). We presented non-degraded or degraded (line segments or corners removed) distractors (line drawings of tools or musical instruments) simultaneously with a target, either at fixation or peripherally. Non-degraded as well as degraded distractors caused higher levels of interference (increased reaction times and a greater number of errors), particularly when presented at fixation, while non-degraded distractors caused greater interference than degraded. Contrary to expectation, however, there was no difference in the level of interference caused by lines-missing and corners-missing distractors, either at fixation or at periphery. Thus, we conclude that, where response to a complex object is required, both lines and corners are equally important components in the visual processing of distractor stimuli.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, 150, 1702 Artificial Intelligence, Field Dependence-Independence, Fixation, Ocular, perception, 2809 Sensory Systems, Young Adult, Sensitivity, Psychophysics, Reaction Time, Humans, School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Attention, Visual selective attention, Components, Form agnosia, Analysis of Variance, visual reaction time, 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Shape, Object recognition, distractor interference, Inferotemporal cortex, Representations, Pattern Recognition, Visual, 1701 Psychology, line drawings, Female, ResPubID19180. distractors, Photic Stimulation
Adult, Male, Adolescent, 150, 1702 Artificial Intelligence, Field Dependence-Independence, Fixation, Ocular, perception, 2809 Sensory Systems, Young Adult, Sensitivity, Psychophysics, Reaction Time, Humans, School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Attention, Visual selective attention, Components, Form agnosia, Analysis of Variance, visual reaction time, 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Shape, Object recognition, distractor interference, Inferotemporal cortex, Representations, Pattern Recognition, Visual, 1701 Psychology, line drawings, Female, ResPubID19180. distractors, Photic Stimulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
