
doi: 10.1068/p030487
pmid: 4462078
Motor-transformation learning theory asserts that people learn through experience what stimulus transformations are under the control of their behavior. More specifically, it asserts that the parameter values of certain predetermined transformation groups are learned. This theory was inferred, in the first place, from research on adaptation to optical rearrangement—in particular, from position-constancy adaptation in inverting-spectacles experiments, prism-displacement experiments, and in more recent computer-controlled feedback experiments. The detailed characteristics of position-constancy adaptation are found to be consistent with the theory. Diverse consequences radiate from the theory for other human abilities, both in perception and in memory retrieval. These diverse implications are tested in studies of (a) learning to manipulate ‘objects’ in an artificial computer-controlled visual space; (b) learning to compute, in the absence of overt action, the consequences of such action; (c) learning how to access the features of prior stimuli by the execution of motor actions.
Behavior, Eye Movements, Adaptation, Ocular, Computers, Pilot Projects, Models, Theoretical, Motor Activity, Proprioception, Feedback, Electrooculography, Memory, Oscillometry, Space Perception, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Humans, Learning
Behavior, Eye Movements, Adaptation, Ocular, Computers, Pilot Projects, Models, Theoretical, Motor Activity, Proprioception, Feedback, Electrooculography, Memory, Oscillometry, Space Perception, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Humans, Learning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
