
doi: 10.1068/d12610
This paper examines the political aesthetic of Hannah Arendt and Jacques Rancière who in their own ways, found resources in an innovative reading of Kant's Critique of Judgment. The paper explores the Kantian legacy in the political understanding of these two thinkers. It then focuses on Rancière's notion of dissensus and argues that his politics shares the aesthetic features associated with the Kantian sublime.
common sense, [SHS.GEO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, Arendt, dissensus, Kant, Rancie© re, sublime, aesthetics, politics, [SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science
common sense, [SHS.GEO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography, Arendt, dissensus, Kant, Rancie© re, sublime, aesthetics, politics, [SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
