
pmid: 12439472
Orthodontic studies over several decades have found generally inconsistent opinions among dentists when evaluating orthodontic treatment need. There has also been recent concern that dental school education does not sufficiently prepare dentists to diagnose malocclusion and make appropriate referrals of potential orthodontic patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of using the index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) as a tool to improve dental students' ability to assess orthodontic treatment need. Fourth-year dental students were randomly divided into control, sham-control, and experimental groups stratified for mean grade point average. On 2 occasions, the subjects evaluated 30 orthodontic study models with a gold standard previously established by an expert panel of 15 orthodontists for orthodontic treatment need. The experimental group reevaluated the models after IOTN instruction. Kappa statistics, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for each subject. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that the experimental group had significantly higher agreement with the expert panel after IOTN training than did either control group. IOTN is a promising teaching aid for improving educational outcomes for orthodontic referral.
Male, Observer Variation, Analysis of Variance, Teaching Materials, Statistics as Topic, Students, Dental, Reproducibility of Results, Orthodontics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Models, Dental, Sex Factors, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Female, Educational Measurement, Education, Dental, Referral and Consultation, Malocclusion, Needs Assessment
Male, Observer Variation, Analysis of Variance, Teaching Materials, Statistics as Topic, Students, Dental, Reproducibility of Results, Orthodontics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Models, Dental, Sex Factors, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Female, Educational Measurement, Education, Dental, Referral and Consultation, Malocclusion, Needs Assessment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
