
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>pmid: 11077342
OBJECTIVEThe goal was to analyze the outcome of surgical therapy for buccal carcinoma.STUDY DESIGNA retrospective chart review was done.SETTINGThe study took place in a major tertiary‐care hospital.RESULTSTwenty‐seven patients received first‐time surgical therapy for buccal carcinoma. Treatment was surgery alone in 15 and surgery followed by radiation therapy in 6 patients. Six additional patients received surgical salvage for radiation therapy failure. Composite resection of the tumor was performed in 16 patients (59%). Five‐year observed actuarial survival rates were 100%, 45%, 67%, and 78%, and locoregional recurrence rates were 0%, 27%, 44%, and 0% for stages I to IV, respectively. The 5‐year actuarial survival rates were 80% after surgery and 82% after surgery and postoperative radiation therapy. Patients who underwent surgical salvage after radiation therapy failure had a 1‐year survival rate of 0%.CONCLUSIONAggressive surgical treatment of buccal carcinoma may result in better survival rates.SIGNIFICANCEThe article analyzes buccal carcinoma in regards to the patterns of presentation, treatments rendered, and patterns of failure.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Mouth Mucosa, Middle Aged, Cheek, Treatment Outcome, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Life Tables, Mouth Neoplasms, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Mouth Mucosa, Middle Aged, Cheek, Treatment Outcome, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Life Tables, Mouth Neoplasms, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 64 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
