Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A comparison of two piezoelectric actuator concepts for fast mechanical switching in DC hybrid circuit breakers

Authors: Mohmmad Al-Dweikat; Guogang Zhang; Yu Liu; Cui Jian;

A comparison of two piezoelectric actuator concepts for fast mechanical switching in DC hybrid circuit breakers

Abstract

Amplified piezoelectric actuators have gained considerable attention due to their inherent advantages, including rapid response, reliability, and efficiency, making them promising candidates for Direct Current (DC) switching applications. They can operate in two distinct operational modes: Block–Free (B–F) and Free–Free (F–F) configurations. These two modes offer diverse mechanical constraints and are chosen based on the application’s specific requirements. This study aims to present a comparative assessment between the two modes to evaluate each configuration’s applicability in DC fast switching. Accordingly, the principle behind each actuation scheme was illustrated, and both designs were modeled and analyzed by the finite element method. Subsequently, two prototypes were assembled, each resembling a different operational mode. The established prototypes were then subjected to actuation and interruption tests to investigate their travel and switching performances. Comparative results revealed that while block–free could deliver a higher apparent stroke, the accumulated gap for each configuration is almost the same. Both actuators demonstrated high capability when utilized as actuation units for fast vacuum mechanical switches integrated into a hybrid circuit breaker for DC interruption. However, the free–free operation excelled in terms of fast response, as it managed to clear the mimicked fault current faster than the block–free configuration.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!