Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Flame–turbulence interactions during flame acceleration using solid and fluid obstacles

Authors: Wandong Zhao; Jianhan Liang; Ralf Deiterding; Xiaodong Cai; Xinxin Wang;

Flame–turbulence interactions during flame acceleration using solid and fluid obstacles

Abstract

A combination of solid and transverse jet obstacles is proposed to trigger flame acceleration and deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT). A numerical study of this approach is performed by solving the reactive Navier–Stokes equations deploying an adaptive mesh refinement technique. A detailed hydrogen–air reaction mechanism with 12 species and 42 steps is employed. The efficiency and mechanisms of the combined obstacles on the flame acceleration are investigated comprehensively. The effects of multiple jets, jet start time, and jet stagnation pressure on the DDT process are studied. Results show that there is a 22.26% improvement in the DDT run-up time and a 33.36% reduction in the DDT run-up distance for the combined obstacles compared to that having only solid obstacles. The jet acts as an obstruction by producing a suitable blockage ratio and introducing an intense turbulent region due to the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. This leads to dramatic flame–turbulence interactions, increasing the flame surface area dramatically. The dual jet produces mushroom-like vortices, leading to a significantly stretched flame front and intensive Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities, and therefore, these features produce a high flame acceleration. As the jet operation time decreases, the jet obstacle almost changes its role from both physical blockage ratio and turbulence and vorticity generator to a physical blockage ratio. There is a moderate jet stagnation pressure that reduces the run-up time to detonation and run-up distance to detonation in the obstacle-laden chamber. While further increasing the jet stagnation pressure, it does not have a positive effect on shortening the detonation transition.

Country
United Kingdom
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!