
doi: 10.1063/1.868665
We evaluate a number of simple, one-point phenomenological models for the decay of energy-containing eddies in magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) and hydrodynamic turbulence. The MHD models include effects of cross helicity and Alfvénic couplings associated with a constant mean magnetic field, based on physical effects well-described in the literature. The analytic structure of three separate MHD models is discussed. The single hydrodynamic model and several MHD models are compared against results from spectral-method simulations. The hydrodynamic model phenomenology has been previously verified against experiments in wind tunnels, and certain experimentally determined parameters in the model are satisfactorily reproduced by the present simulation. This agreement supports the suitability of our numerical calculations for examining MHD turbulence, where practical difficulties make it more difficult to study physical examples. When the triple-decorrelation time and effects of spectral anisotropy are properly taken into account, particular MHD models give decay rates that remain correct to within a factor of 2 for several energy-halving times. A simple model of this type is likely to be useful in a number of applications in space physics, astrophysics, and laboratory plasma physics where the approximate effects of turbulence need to be included.
Isotropic turbulence; homogeneous turbulence, Magnetohydrodynamics and electrohydrodynamics
Isotropic turbulence; homogeneous turbulence, Magnetohydrodynamics and electrohydrodynamics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 161 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
