Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Analyzing energy landscapes for folding model proteins

Authors: Graham A, Cox; Roy L, Johnston;

Analyzing energy landscapes for folding model proteins

Abstract

A new benchmark 20-bead HP model protein sequence (on a square lattice), which has 17 distinct but degenerate global minimum (GM) energy structures, has been studied using a genetic algorithm (GA). The relative probabilities of finding particular GM conformations are determined and related to the theoretical probability of generating these structures using a recoil growth constructor operator. It is found that for longer successful GA runs, the GM probability distribution is generally very different from the constructor probability, as other GA operators have had time to overcome any initial bias in the originally generated population of structures. Structural and metric relationships (e.g., Hamming distances) between the 17 distinct GM are investigated and used, in conjunction with data on the connectivities of the GM and the pathways that link them, to explain the GM probability distributions obtained by the GA. A comparison is made of searches where the sequence is defined in the normal (forward) and reverse directions. The ease of finding mirror image solutions are also compared. Finally, this approach is applied to rationalize the ease or difficulty of finding the GM for a number of standard benchmark HP sequences on the square lattice. It is shown that the relative probabilities of finding particular members of a set of degenerate global minima depend critically on the topography of the energy landscape in the vicinity of the GM, the connections and distances between the GM, and the nature of the operators used in the chosen search method.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Protein Folding, Models, Statistical, Models, Genetic, Chemistry, Physical, Protein Conformation, Molecular Conformation, Proteins, Models, Theoretical, Mutation, Monte Carlo Method, Algorithms, Probability

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!