
doi: 10.1057/jors.1982.8
The values of names, addresses and dates of birth for identifying individuals uniquely depends on several factors. This note shows how to combine the inherent power of an identifier, its availability and its error rate to give a practical measure for ranking its usefulness. The theory is developed in terms of selecting a number of non-unique identifiers to form a composite key with sufficient redundancy to identify individuals in an automated system. The note concludes with an indication of other classification, allocation and decision processes to which the technique may be applied.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
