
doi: 10.1057/eps.2004.19
Introducing gender quotas in politics is often a difficult endeavour: quotas tend to trigger controversial debates between those who find them a necessary, just and legitimate measure to redress women's under-representation, and those who think that they are arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to the free will of the voter or an obstacle to national cohesion. More or less explicitly, quota debates extend to issues much wider than the narrow question of women's presence in parliament: discourses on gender quotas express contrasting understandings of political justice; gender, gender identities and gender inequalities; and the role of the state with regard to social and political inequalities between women and men. More generally, quota debates can be considered as sites of struggle for the redefinition of the relation between gender, justice and the political.
320
320
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
