
Current scholarly knowledge suggests that direct legislation affects policy making in various ways.1 One way is directly, when voters pass laws by initiative or referendum. A second way is indirectly, when legislators or other policy-makers respond to the threat of, or act in anticipation of, initiatives or referendums. Many recent studies have advanced our understanding of direct effects by analyzing what types of policies voters pass by initiative and referendum. For example, Tolbert (1998) notes that many laws passed by direct legislation involve governance policies that regulate elected officials. Schrag (1998) claims that middle-class white voters use direct legislation to pass conservative fiscal and social legislation in the US states. Gerber (1999) shows that broad-based citizen groups use direct legislation to pass majoritarian policies. Gamble (1997) argues that citizens use direct legislation to take away legislative protections for minorities, although Donovan and Bowler (1998b) and Frey and Goette (1998) claim that the effects on minorities are much less detrimental than Gamble asserts.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
