
Historiography, or the writing of history, has gained significant ground in theatre scholarship over the past few decades, but its impact on children’s theatre, or Theatre for Young Audiences (TYA) as it is now commonly referred to, has been generally ignored. Nonetheless, the way in which historians constructed a narrative, derived from the critical examination of their selection and interpretation of facts that is colored by their own ideological positions and identity locations, has greatly impacted TYA. The field is fraught with myths and axioms perpetuated through history in various cultural and sociological contexts.1 From Mark Twain in the United States to Alexandra Gozenpud in Soviet Russia, writers have claimed “firsts,” “most significants,” and “influentials,” constructing an image of the field that was at the very least incomplete, periodizing and situating it in a liminal and limiting frame of what Roger Bedard coined as “theatre-but-not-theatre” (“Negotiating” 98).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
