<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 19 May 2016 Italy Publisher:Massachusetts Medical SocietyJournal:New England Journal of Medicine, volume 374, pages 1,954-1,964 (issn: 0028-4793, eissn: 1533-4406,

Authors: BARBATO, EMANUELE; Toth, Gabor G; De Bruyne, Bernard;

doi: 10.1056/nejmra1406944 , 10.1056/nejmc1608042

pmid: 27192673 , 27602685 , 27602684 , 27602683

pmc: PMC5135735

handle: 11588/649007 , 11573/1660365

Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This review deals with the surgical technique and the evidence-based data on the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and its complications. The advances of CABG over percutaneous coronary intervention and drug therapy in various clinical situations are analyzed. It is stated, that the most significant clinical improvement after CABG could be expected is case of careful selection of patients for this surgery.

Country

Italy

Related Organizations

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary Bypass, coronary artery bypass grafting, Heart Valve Diseases, Arteries, Coronary Artery Disease, ischemic heart disease, Diabetes Complications, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Treatment Outcome, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Arteries; Humans; Treatment Outcome; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Coronary Artery Bypass, RC666-701, Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, Humans, Coronary Artery Bypass

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	216
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%