Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Untersuchungen zur Okulopressions-Tonometrie

Authors: Dümmler R; Klingel R; Pillunat Le; Stodtmeister R;

Untersuchungen zur Okulopressions-Tonometrie

Abstract

A new method has recently been suggested for the determination of the outflow resistance in the anterior chamber angle. In this method the intraocular pressure is set to 45 mmHg for 8 minutes. The intraocular pressure is measured after the removal of the suction cup. Values below 7 mmHg are obtained in healthy subjects. Values above 7 mmHg are thought to be indicative for glaucoma. By setting the intraocular pressure to 45 mmHg for the expression of fluid the authors claim to have brought normalization to tonography. We show here in a series of results that we can reproduce the results which have been published by Ulrich et al. For normalization of a tonographic test we need a pressure rise which effects a uniform expression of volume. According to the knowledge presently generally agreed upon a uniform expression of volume is obtained by increasing the intraocular pressure by a constant factor and not by increasing it to a constant level. In 30 healthy volunteers and in 30 glaucoma patients we have increased the intraocular pressure by the constant factor of 1.8. According to our results the glaucoma patients and the healthy subjects can no longer be differentiated. A better differentiation is possible by the initial intraocular pressure. Thus we have shown that the favorable results by ocular pressure tonometry are mainly due to the intraocular pressure before the test. We feel therefore that ocular pressure tonometry should not be incorporated in our diagnostic armamentarium for glaucoma diagnosis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Diagnosis, Differential, Tonometry, Ocular, Pressure, Humans, Glaucoma, Ocular Physiological Phenomena, Intraocular Pressure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?