Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Quadrileaflet Stentless Mitral Valve Replacement

Authors: T, Walther; C, Walther; V, Falk; G, Langebartels; M, Krüger; A, Dagge; A, Diegeler; +2 Authors

Quadrileaflet Stentless Mitral Valve Replacement

Abstract

The study evaluates clinical results and hemodynamic parameters one year after implantation of a stentless quadrileaflet mitral valve (QMV).Since August 1997 28 patients received the QMV, patient age was 69 +/- 8 years; 13 had predominant mitral stenosis and 15 incompetence, preoperative NYHA functional class was III or IV and cardiac index 1.8 +/- 0.6 L/min/m2.Surgery was performed using a conventional (25) or a minimally invasive approach (3). 20 patients received a medium and 8 a large-size prosthesis, crossclamp time was 58 +/- 19 min. Additional procedures were myocardial revascularization in four, tricuspid repair in two, and left-atrial radiofrequency ablation to restore sinus rhythm in six patients. Perioperative mortality (1) was not valve-related. All other patients were discharged on time. At postoperative, 6-, and 12-months follow-up mean transvalvular pressure gradients were 4.2 +/- 1.5 / 4 +/- 0.9/ 3.8 +/- 1.4 mmHg and mitral valve orifice area index was 1.5 +/- 0.3 / 1.6 +/- 0.3 / 1.6 +/- 0.4, NYHA class was I or II.The QMV is well suited for mitral valve replacement. The anulo-ventricular continuity is preserved and the QMV function resembles native mitral valve function. If its performance is maintained in the long term the QMV may be the mitral prosthesis of choice.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Time Factors, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Hemodynamics, Humans, Mitral Valve, Female, Prosthesis Design, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!