
pmid: 12173254
This paper describes an approach to assessment aimed at developing critical skills in the production of arguments concerning contemporary issues in health. It is demonstrated that, in teaching from a constructivist position of knowledge, students can be cautious in producing assignments because of the relativist characteristic of constructivism. It is proposed that students could be more open and flexible in their approach to assessment and the use of cooperative working through the creation of narratives. It is suggested that narratives can provide an accessible and heuristic process from which academic accounts may be built. The use of narratives in taking the students from their everyday thinking to academic accounts is presented in relation to four teaching sessions. The use of this approach is in turn evaluated by students' narratives of their learning experience. Of 30 narratives obtained from students, analysis demonstrated that 21 accounts expressed aspects associated with the development of critical thinking. Nine students voiced some dissatisfaction with the assessment process, and further work to remedy these problems is outlined.
Attitude of Health Personnel, Writing, 370, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Thinking, Knowledge, Nursing Education Research, Humans, Philosophy, Nursing, Students, Nursing, Clinical Competence, Nursing Process, Program Evaluation
Attitude of Health Personnel, Writing, 370, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Thinking, Knowledge, Nursing Education Research, Humans, Philosophy, Nursing, Students, Nursing, Clinical Competence, Nursing Process, Program Evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
