
Histological assessments continue to have an important role in the diagnosis and management of graft complications following liver transplantation. For some conditions, such as liver allograft rejection, histology is regarded as the "gold standard" for diagnosis. In other cases, where a likely cause of graft dysfunction has been identified using other methods, liver biopsy provides important additional information (e.g., severity of necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis in recurrent hepatitis C infection) and may point to the presence of an additional or alternative cause for graft dysfunction. In cases where a dual pathology is suspected (eg, hepatitis C and rejection), histological findings can help to identify the main cause of graft dysfunction. This article will focus on the main patterns of damage that are seen in post-transplant liver biopsies and their differential diagnosis. As with the assessment of liver biopsies in the native liver, clinico-pathological correlation is very important. Consideration should also be given to the therapeutic implications of the biopsy report, in particular whether changes in immunosuppression are indicated.
Graft Rejection, Epstein-Barr Virus Infections, Biliary Tract Diseases, Biopsy, Liver Diseases, Graft Survival, Organ Preservation, Hepatitis C, Tissue Donors, Liver Transplantation, Hepatitis, Autoimmune, Treatment Outcome, Liver, Recurrence, Reperfusion Injury, Cytomegalovirus Infections, Transplantation, Homologous, Humans, Vascular Diseases
Graft Rejection, Epstein-Barr Virus Infections, Biliary Tract Diseases, Biopsy, Liver Diseases, Graft Survival, Organ Preservation, Hepatitis C, Tissue Donors, Liver Transplantation, Hepatitis, Autoimmune, Treatment Outcome, Liver, Recurrence, Reperfusion Injury, Cytomegalovirus Infections, Transplantation, Homologous, Humans, Vascular Diseases
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 73 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
