
The use of ion-beam-assisted etching to form ~ 1.5-µm diameter waveguiding "posts", or microresonators, in a GaAs/AlAs Fabry-Perot structure grown entirely by molecular beam epitaxy has reduced the device cross-sectional areas, energy requirements and recovery times all by more than an order of magnitude1. Prior to etching the minimum controlling energy required for an optical logic etalon operation2 was 20 pJ. The device diameter, defined as the illuminated region, was about 10 µm and recovery time was estimated to be several ns, both inferred from measurements on comparable devices. For 1.5-µm microresonators the energy is 0.6 pJ and recovery time, ~ 200 ps (Fig. 1). Thus, at least over this size range, the energy and time requirements scale directly with cross-sectional area. It is likely that this scaling will continue down to λ/n diameters, i.e. to 1/4 µm for GaAs, or another factor 36 in area. This would reduce controlling energies to ~ 17 fJ and recovery times to ~ 6 ps for the same Fabry-Perot design. The energies (but not recovery times) should be much further reduced by use of thinner, higher-finesse etalons, and much further still by use of excitonic nonlinearities which are not cancelled out by bandgap renormalization. The latter might be obtained from sufficiently-high-quality quantum confining semiconductors or operation at reduced temperatures. With all these improvements, controlling energies should approach the statistical limit of a few hundred photons3,4.
[PHYS.HIST] Physics [physics]/Physics archives
[PHYS.HIST] Physics [physics]/Physics archives
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
